The ideas expressed in Sydel's video differ from Chuck D and Lars Ulrich because Sydel focuses on revenue that artist's lose ,while Ulrich said that they lose "mere pocket change." The Sydel video proposed the idea of artists such as Coltham giving away their music but Ulrich would never agree with that because he believes that artists should have the right to control their music and their revenue.
Both videos agree on the point that technology plays a large issue in this debate. Ulrich knows that technology cannot be stopped, no matter how badly he wants it to be, and he realizes that artists and the rest of the world are trailing behind technology. Sydel's video states the fact that technology has not yet reached the point where it can give people full connectedness to their music, meaning be able to listen and watch anything the consumer wants on any device at any time. Both videos agree that technology cannot be stopped and yet it is not perfect.
No comments:
Post a Comment